Anomaly (2016) ⚡ Quick

Measuring local providers against rigorous national safety and accuracy metrics .

Ensuring every screening event is recorded accurately to provide a true national picture. Anomaly (2016)

One of the most valuable aspects of the 2016 report is its identification of "recurring themes" in non-submission or partial submission of data. While the program has seen high levels of engagement, certain administrative and technical hurdles continue to impact the completeness of the national dataset. Key areas highlighted include: While the program has seen high levels of

Below is a blog post drafted for a healthcare or professional screening audience. It evaluates how well we are identifying potential

Covering the period from , this report serves as a benchmark for national standards. It evaluates how well we are identifying potential anomalies and where the gaps in data submission still exist. For sonographers, it’s an essential tool for quality assurance and professional development . The Core Challenges: Recurring Themes

from the 2016 FASP report (e.g., detection rates for specific conditions). Guidelines for sonographers based on the 2016 standards.

Navigating the Data: Key Takeaways from the 2016–2017 Fetal Anomaly Screening Report